Celestron X-cel LX review: Perfect for newbies

This is where I was able to make a comparison and although they have a smaller field of view than the X Cel LX, I found them far superior in every aspect. The 9mm Celestron Xcel-LX eyepiece has 3.5x more magnification than their 32mm Omni Plossl so the view is less bright. So my experience is that, at the shorter focal lengths, the Xcel LX’s offsets are quite severe and not worth it, giving nowhere near the 90% mentioned above. It might also be an idea to check out the BSTs, which also get a good review, although I have no idea how they compare to the X-Cel LX.

Throughout this review article, I’ll share with you my experience using each of the eyepieces and the 2x barlow lens – I’ve found that they’re one of the best telescope eyepiece for viewing planets. It seems to come down to the fact that both the TV and Celestron posters are good enough eyepieces, so I make my own choice.

Celestron X-cel LX review

It seems to come down to the fact that both the TV plossl and the Celestron are good enough eyepieces, so I make my own choice. As it stands, just looking at the numbers something like a 32mm Plossl, 18mm and 9mm LXs would be worth it. The 9mm Celestron Xcel-LX eyepiece has 3.5x more magnification than your 32mm Plossl Omni so the view is less bright. So my experience is that, at the shorter focal lengths, the Xcel LX’s offsets are quite severe and not worth it, giving nowhere near the 90% mentioned above.

One big variation from the cheaper range is that, instead of a flip-down rubber eyepiece, the X-Cel range has a rotating eyepiece. There is also a concern that some examples of the LX range have had what can only be described as small bits of plastic, or a dark looking speck of dust inside the PE itself. I bought the Celestron x cel lx 9mmm lens as it was on offer, it looks and feels great, but that’s where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these lenses and the amount of light lost is shocking. I bought the Celestron x cel LX 9mmm lens as it was on sale, it looks and feels great, but that’s where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these lenses and the amount of light lost is shocking.

The 11mm TV looking through hole is tiny compared to the Celestron and I’m just starting out and not sure I can get used to the small hole. I bought the Celestron x Cel lx 9mmm lens as it was on sale, it looks and feels great, but that’s where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these lenses and the amount of light lost is shocking. The X-Cel LX’s offer a wide 60° field of view, which is ideal for capturing large objects like the moon and galaxies. I bought the Celestron x Cel LX 9mmm lens because it was on sale, it looks and feels great, but that’s where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these lenses and the amount of light lost is shocking.

When combined with the 12mm eyepiece to look at the moon, I found the LX Barlow gave me a new level of observing joy. I bought the Celestron X cel lx 9mmm lens as it was on sale, it looks and feels great, but that is where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these lenses and the amount of light lost is shocking. Celestron’s X-Cel LX eyepieces are their mid-level, wide field of view eyepieces. I bought the Celestron X Cel lx 9mmm eyepiece as it was on sale, it looks and feels great but that is where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these eyepieces and the amount of light lost is shocking.

There seems to be very little talk about the new celestron x-cel LX eyepieces. The Celestron X Cel LX 9mm eyepiece I bought because it was on sale, it looks and feels great but that’s where the quality ends, there is too much glass in these eyepieces and the amount of light lost is shocking. There seems to be very little talk about the new x-cel lx eyepieces from celestron. I get to work with them and find out if they are worth it.

celestron x-cel lx

It is constructed with a 6-element lens configuration, blackened edges and multi-coated anti-reflective optical surfaces to ensure bright, clear, high-contrast images with true color transmission across the entire wide 60° field of view. All seven eyepieces of the X-Cel LX have 16 mm eye relief and are parfocal, which means you can change eyepieces in the series during observing sessions without focusing. Celestron has designed the X-Cel LX eyepiece series with a long 16 mm eye relief that moves the user’s face away from the viewfinder to minimize vibrations caused by contact with the eyepiece. On the road, in the workplace, in the classroom, or just sitting at home relaxing – the Celestron Elements ThermoTank 3 will keep your hands warm.

You will literally have to spend at least twice as much to find a better eyepiece than the Celtron x-cel LX. All of the eyepieces in the series are fully parfocal, which makes changing eyepieces convenient by not having to refocus. In my latest eyepiece test, Rother Valley Optics* loaned me four models from the celestron x-cel lx eyepiece range. The housing is made of a lightweight, durable aluminum alloy with a matte anodized finish that limits glare, and a retractable eyecup that extends with a simple twist for comfortable use with or without glasses.

The X-Cel LX’s seven eyepieces have 16mm eye relief and are parfocal, which means you can change eyepieces in the series during observing sessions without focusing. It also provides an easy way to orient yourself in the sky by displaying a larger field of view than the type of eyepieces your telescope came with. The Celestron X-Cel LX 25mm eyepiece is designed for comfortable close-up and deep space astronomical observing. With a 1.25 diameter barrel, it will fit most common sizes of extraction tubes, visual backs and accessories; and a rubberized collar provides a non-slip grip, especially in cold weather and when wearing gloves.

When it comes to high-quality, wide-field eyepieces at affordable prices, it’s hard to beat Celestron’s X-Cel LX range. The newly improved X-Cel LX eyepiece series is what you have been waiting for in a high quality eyepiece for planetary observing.

References: